Maybe you and the rest of the Hitler Youth could find another comet
to
hitch a ride on. To assume that these were peace loving individuals
only
shows how "objective" you really are. Enjoy your obscurity.
At 10:59 AM 4/30/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Maybe you and the rest of the Hitler Youth could find another comet
to
>hitch a ride on. To assume that these were peace loving
individuals only
>shows how "objective" you really are. Enjoy your obscurity.
>
>
Just think. 17 meg of information, and the best you can do is call me "Hitler Youth." You have not raised one intelligent objection to all that material.
But then it is obvious to me you have read virtually nothing of the Museum. The analysis in the Museum is based on research data that is posted on the website for your examination--95% from government or quasi-government sources.
Calling me Hitler Youth is ironic. You see, Jeff, when I was young I read about the Holocaust in Europe. I was filled with horror. I could not understand how the German people could have stood by idly and let it happen. I vowed that I would not look away from a similar situation, but come forward and say "No," as German citizens should have come forward.
As far as obscurity goes, Jeff, can you understand that some folk are not motivated by a desire to be admired, but by a desire to take righteous action? In the case of the Waco Holocaust, this righteous action was my research, analysis, and dissemination of the Museum. I have never sought the limelight. I care not if only a few hundred thousand people around the globe know of the existence of the Museum.
Over the cornice of the Supreme Court are these words: "Equal Justice Under Law." That is the theme of the Museum. If you find fault with it, it is you, not I, who are out of step with the heritage of this country, and the dream of all humanity.
Have a nice day.
Wonderful comeback...you must have stayed up all night. I
particularly
enjoy your quoted "quasi government sources." I believe the
right phrase
would be "pseudo government" sources. Your attempt to "enlighten"
the
world by defending the Branch Dividian Cult (who were guilty of
arms
violations, tax evasion, countless sexual offenses against minors,
etc.)
turns my stomach. Interestingly enough, none of this was
found in your
"museum." Why Carol? I'm not going to waste any more
of my time...or
yours by going into the crap you try to pass off as fact.
If you and your
kind are of the mindset that our government operates as one big
cover up,
use the weapon that everyone under our constitution can be LEGALLY
ARMED
WITH. It's called the vote. Try it sometime.
By defendings slime bags
like David Koresch, you show your hand much too quickly.
We are one nation
under God...not a free-form bunch of radicals living in Texas who
feel they
are above paying taxes or living under the morals ordained by God.
READ AND UNDERSTAND!!!! You need to get a new set of friends Carol.
At 07:21 AM 5/1/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Wonderful comeback...you must have stayed up all night.
Is it possible for you to communicate on this issue without hatred? Why would you assume I am insincere, and my answer to you studied and contrived?
> I particularly
>enjoy your quoted "quasi government sources." I believe
the right phrase
>would be "pseudo government" sources.
I said what I meant. There are many government documents in the Museum--the quasi-government sources refer to the releases the government spokesmen made to the news media.
> Your attempt to "enlighten" the
>world by defending the Branch Dividian Cult (who were guilty of
arms
>violations, tax evasion, countless sexual offenses against minors,
etc.)
>turns my stomach. Interestingly enough, none of this was
found in your
>"museum."
The Branch Davidians were not "guilty" of anything at all under our system of justice. Consider this--none of those Branch Davidians were indicted, tried by jury, found guilty, or sentenced before they were executed. Let's take your claim of "countless sexual offense against minors." No charges of even one such offense was ever filed against David Koresh by any duly constituted authority. He was never tried, except in the press. He was never found guilty, except by the press.
There were many accusations against Hitler's victims, too. Shall we ponder over whether the German Jewish bankers charged too much interest? Or whether the Gypsies stole children? Or whether the mental patients really were useless eaters? Some justification for murder!
But let's not get trapped by irrelevancies. The February 28 raid was NOT a law enforcement action. It was a domestic military Gulf of Tonkin incident, designed to fail.
> Why Carol? I'm not going to waste any more of my time...or
>yours by going into the crap
In as much as you have not examined the material you are attempting to criticize, I would agree with you.
> you try to pass off as fact. If you and your
>kind are of the mindset that our government operates as one big
cover up,
>use the weapon that everyone under our constitution can be LEGALLY
ARMED
>WITH. It's called the vote. Try it sometime.
By defendings slime bags
>like David Koresch, you show your hand much too quickly.
We are one nation
>under God...not a free-form bunch of radicals living in Texas
who feel they
>are above paying taxes or living under the morals ordained by
God.
>
I don't know if David Koresh was a "slime bag," but, even so, being a slime bag is not a capital offense. Again, none of those Branch Davidians were indicted, tried by jury, found guilty, or sentenced before they were executed. How does that comport with our Constitutional heritage? The Branch Davidian survivors who were tried were found NOT guilty (by a jury) of murdering the ATF agents
Of all the people killed during the German Holocaust in WWII, do you know for sure none of those victims were "slime bags" or even "child molesters"? How could unproven accusations against the victims justify murder during WWII? Or in this case?
The Branch Davidians probably even voted . . . as you suggest. Maybe their murderers voted, too. Voting has nothing to do with the subject we are discussing.
>READ AND UNDERSTAND!!!! You need to get a new set of friends
Carol.
>
I knew nothing of the Branch Davidians before 1993. If you had read the Museum, you would know that I clearly stated I questioned a number of critical statements made by the surviving Branch Davidians.
Jeff, I believe that people of goodwill can iron out big differences provided that they are operating on true data. This was one of my purposes in creating the Museum. That's why I posted the original research data.
Your hatred for people you never met apparently makes you unable to look at the 17 meg of documented evidence in the Museum. What is the difference between your attitude today and the attitude of the illiterates of the Middle Ages who demanded that the witches be burned at the stake? The priests promoted hatred for the victims and the crowds roared approval when they were burned.
And what is the difference between your attitude that of the Good Germans who looked the other way and held their noses?
The 17 meg of information in the Museum takes patience to study. Some people put a bookmark on a page and return again and again as time permits to study the material. You can do the same. Start at the Death Gallery . . . look at the Autopsy Reports, the transcripts of the Branch Davidians' trial, the government documents . . . the concrete room where the bodies of the mothers and the children and babies were found, dismembered, pulped, mutilated, burned . . . This was Murder One, Jeff, of the most hideous kind, and I have gathered many times the evidence needed for indictment.
People throughout the world are studying the data in the Museum in meticulous detail. Your hatred is denying you the knowledge they are absorbing. You are now behind the knowledge power curve on Waco. Not smart, Jeff.
Catch you later.