>Perhaps because the evidence on her site contradicts your earlier book's
>theories - and you staunchly refuse to consider *that* evidence... as you
>attack *her* for her presentation of the facts.
 

MW, did you notice C. Moore's continuous shifting on the subject of
"theories"?  First she could not find my "theories."  Then she said my
"theories" were nutty.  When that did not fly, she said I stole my
"theories" from other [more respectable] people, such as Ken Fawcett
and Gordon Novel.  ;-)

Theory is a subject in itself.  Like a boat, a theory won't float with
a hole in it.

Until the masses of publicly available evidence was collected and
published in the Museum, people were able to say almost anything about
the incident. The "news" services and government mouthpieces had a
field day.

Then along came the Museum. The evidence in the Museum pokes a lot of
theories full of holes. Here are some of the real hole-pokers.

1. Waco was not a law enforcement action. It was military, from Day
One to Day 51.

2. The action against the Branch Davidians was never intended to
succeed. Like the phony Gulf of Tonkin incident that earned the
military the blank check it needed for the Viet Nam war, the raid on
the Branch Davidians was intended to fail. They intended the Davidians
to find out ahead of time, they intended the Davidians to meet fire
with fire, they intended for some federal agents to get shot up and
die, and they
intended an tidal wave of national rage against the Davidians.

3. The Justice report on the February 28 is a flat lie: The Davidians
did not meet the agents with a hail of gunfire.  On the contrary,
photographs of the ground team's raid on the front of the Mt. Carmel
Center indicate no return fire from the Davidians.

4. There is good reason to believe that more than six Davidians were
killed on the first day.

5. Given the above, the whole negotiation saga was bogus. What was
there to negotiate? The agents did not care who lived and who died,
judging from the initial raid and the April 19 attack. Rather, the
long siege was a re-education campaign for the American Public. The
lesson, among others, was that (a) the military must partake in
domestic law enforcement (b) killing people with snipers is OK if they
don't do as they are told (c) the news services are government PR
firms --and so forth, a whole host of things that changed forever the
relationship of the individual to the US government.

6. The Davidians were held captive by the agents with barbed wire and
flash bang grenades. This is revealed in the DoJ report.

7. The Davidian population was salted with undercover agents, before
and during the siege. Who walked, who died, who was prosecuted, who
went free, who disappeared, who is in jail--get all that sorted out,
and we get to the tough questions. Who were the agents? Are any of the
current "Davidians" just
government decoys? (decoy: noun, an artificial bird or animal, or
sometimes a trained live one, used to lure game to a place where it
can be shot.-- Webster's New World Dictionary, Second College Edition,
1970. )

8. The Davidians were tortured for almost two months with sleep
deprivation, horror, deaths of family and friends, and so forth. As
they were released from Mt. Carmel, the were "interviewed" by the
"Hostage Rescue Team", the Special Operations-trained death squad of
the FBI. If they were treated kindly and not threatened at this point,
I'm a fool: maybe puppies are born with diapers.

9. The tank and CS attack were not an attempt to drive the Davidians
out. They were a cover to confuse the real time and circumstances of
the deaths. The tank attack made a perfect fire trap of the building.
But the main purpose for the tanks was to scare the bejabbers out of
the rest of America. to demonstrate the military muscle. Sort of like
a parade, only different.

10. The mothers did not retreat to the concrete room for shelter from
the CS. There are many reasons for doubting this story, but one good
solid one is the condition of the bodies: A number of them were long
dead at this point.

11. The condition of those bodies is not consistent with any official
explanation of how the mothers and children died.

12. The concrete room was marked for demolition under cover of the
fire, but the demolition failed.  Regardless of obvious evidence to
the contrary, the cover story of the "bunker collapse" was used to
explain many deaths.  The evidence in the Museum blew a hole in the
cover story.

13.  A small hole, approximately the size of a manhole cover, was
blown in the ceiling of the concrete room.  It is not credible that
10-12 people could die of blunt force trauma/suffocation from burial
by the small amount of debris from this hole.

14. The fire on April 19 lasted approximately 40-45 minutes. Yet many
of the bodies showed more heat damage than could be expected from a
short duration house fire.

This is only a sampling of the many things you will find in the
Museum. The wealth of evidence tells the story.

I do not pretend to be the author of all this information. There is a
whole bibliography, and there is a page called "Sources of
Information" that explains how I set about evaluating the many
sources.  Much of the information comes from official and
quasi-official publicly available sources and can be independently
verified.

When the volume of evil of this incident is confronted, we realize the
following:

a) Those who speak casually of the incident are ignorant, or callous
beyond belief.

b) Those who plead that the government just had a accident, gosh darn,
are as monstrous as Nazi apologists.

c) Those who knowingly attempt to delude others about the nature of
the incident are operating on an agenda not wholly consistent with the
purpose of civilization.

Carol A. Valentine
President, Public Action, Inc.

Have you seen the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum?
See what they did to the mothers and children--

http://www.Public-Action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum

ÐÏࡱáð